NPR ran a segment yesterday with Sabreena Merchant of The Athletic, arguing that the WNBA has become a political prop and that culture war fights are overshadowing what she calls the best basketball the league has ever played.
She is right about the basketball. She is right that the league is having a landmark year. Viewership and attendance are up, franchise valuations are climbing, and the league just signed a $3.1 billion media rights deal. The new collective bargaining agreement finally lifted salaries off a base that had players flying to Russia and Turkey every offseason just to make a living. All of that is real and all of it is good.
The framing around it is where things get interesting.
A quick history refresher.
The WNBA did not become political in 2026. The WNBA has been proudly, explicitly, deliberately political for the better part of a decade, and for most of that time the league considered it a selling point.
Players wore social justice messaging on their warmups. The league ran league-wide campaigns. Games were postponed for political protest. Every one of those decisions was covered admiringly by the same outlets now describing politics as an unwelcome intrusion.
And then there is 2020, which nobody who was paying attention has forgotten.
Atlanta Dream co-owner Kelly Loeffler was a sitting United States senator. WNBA players across the league put on Vote Warnock shirts, in an organized campaign, aimed directly at removing her from office.
Warnock won the seat.
That was not a prop. That was professional athletes deploying a sports league as a political instrument to flip a United States Senate seat, and the coverage at the time treated it as inspiring. It was on magazine covers.
You do not get to spend a decade building that and then express surprise when politics shows up uninvited.
About the 206 segments.
The NPR piece cites Media Matters counting at least 206 Fox News segments on the WNBA since late June, offered as evidence of manufactured outrage.
Here is the trouble with using a segment count as proof that a story is fake. It measures how much one network talked. It does not measure whether anything happened.
Things happened.
A Seattle Storm co-owner confronted two sixteen-year-old girls at a game over a sign thanking a player, called them a word we will not print, and told them they were un-Christian. One of them cried. The league suspended her five games and fined her.
Security at a Dream game in Atlanta told a mother and her seventeen-year-old daughter to cover up their shirts or be removed from the building, during a game the team had branded as Wellness and Health Night. The WNBA later acknowledged that was handled wrong.
A sports columnist at the Seattle Times resigned after eleven years when the paper refused to run his column about those teenage girls, a story that happened at a Seattle arena involving a Seattle team.
Those are not talking points. Those are events, with names and dates, and every one of them was resolved in a way that conceded the critics had a point.
The part worth taking seriously.
The Chicago Sky have brought in national security consultants to help protect players off the court.
Nobody should be glib about that. Athletes receiving credible threats is a real problem, it is ugly, and anybody sending them deserves whatever they get. Disagreeing with a league's politics has never required menacing the women who play in it, and anyone who thinks otherwise is not on our side.
Commissioner Cathy Engelbert is also stepping down at the end of the calendar year, which is the most underreported item in that entire interview.
So here is the actual situation.
The league is thriving. New fans arrived. Some of them do not share the politics of the older fanbase, and they are not going away, because they bought tickets.
A league that spent ten years telling America that sports and politics are inseparable now has a fanbase that took it at its word.
That is not a culture war being imposed from outside.
That is the bill arriving.
- Article Source:
Based Apparel
- Photo:
