Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has reached a new low in political discourse, publicly accusing Vice President JD Vance of believing that American citizens "should be assassinated in the street." The shocking statement—made without evidence, context, or even coherent explanation—represents the latest escalation in Democrats' increasingly unhinged attacks on the Trump administration and exposes the dangerous extremism that now defines the progressive left.
AOC's deranged accusation isn't political hyperbole or passionate disagreement—it's eliminationist rhetoric designed to incite violence against conservative leaders by portraying them as genocidal monsters. By claiming Vance supports mass murder of American citizens, the radical congresswoman is painting a target on the Vice President's back while delegitimizing the democratically-elected administration that crushed Democrats in the 2024 election.
This is what Democrats have become: a party so consumed by hatred, so detached from reality, and so desperate to regain power that they're willing to accuse their political opponents of supporting mass murder. It's disgusting, dangerous, and disqualifying—yet perfectly consistent with the left's descent into total madness.
The Baseless Accusation
AOC's assassination accusation came during a unhinged social media rant where she claimed Vance's policy positions somehow translate into support for killing Americans in the streets. The "logic" behind this smear is non-existent. Vance has never advocated violence against anyone. He's never suggested extrajudicial killings. He's never expressed anything remotely resembling support for murdering citizens.
So what prompted this psychotic accusation? Apparently, AOC disagrees with conservative immigration enforcement, criminal justice policies, or some other aspect of the administration's agenda—and her diseased mind translates policy disagreement into "he wants people assassinated." This is the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the modern left on full display.
The congresswoman who constantly lectures about "dangerous rhetoric" and "political violence" has now accused the Vice President of the United States of supporting mass murder. The hypocrisy is breathtaking, but entirely predictable. For Democrats, rules only apply to their opponents. They can say anything, accuse anyone of anything, and expect their compliant media allies to nod along approvingly.
Democrats' History of Violent Rhetoric
AOC's assassination rhetoric fits a disturbing pattern of Democrats inciting violence while simultaneously claiming to oppose it:
Maxine Waters told supporters to confront Trump administration officials in restaurants and gas stations, creating a climate where conservative officials faced harassment and threats wherever they appeared in public.
Chuck Schumer stood outside the Supreme Court and threatened Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh by name, declaring they would "pay the price" and "won't know what hit you" if they ruled against abortion. An assassin later attempted to murder Justice Kavanaugh at his home.
Nancy Pelosi refused to condemn violent protests outside conservative Justices' homes despite federal law explicitly prohibiting such intimidation, effectively endorsing threats against the judiciary.
Multiple Democrat Officials encouraged, justified, or defended the 2020 BLM riots that caused billions in property damage, destroyed communities, and resulted in dozens of deaths. Kamala Harris literally promoted a bail fund for arrested rioters.
The Squad regularly uses inflammatory rhetoric portraying conservatives as Nazis, fascists, and genocidal murderers—language designed to justify violence against those so described.
Now AOC adds accusing the Vice President of supporting street assassinations to this rogues' gallery of Democrat incitement. The pattern is unmistakable: Democrats use violent rhetoric constantly while claiming any conservative pushback constitutes "dangerous" speech that threatens democracy.
The Real Motive: Delegitimization
AOC's real goal isn't expressing sincere belief that Vance supports murder—she's attempting to delegitimize the Trump administration by portraying it as so extreme, so dangerous, that any means of resistance becomes justified. If Vance really supported assassinating Americans in the streets, wouldn't resistance—even violent resistance—be not just justified but morally obligatory?
This is the insidious logic behind eliminationist rhetoric. By portraying political opponents as murderous monsters rather than fellow citizens with different policy views, the left creates psychological permission structures for violence. If conservatives really are Nazis planning genocide, then attacking them becomes heroic resistance rather than criminal violence.
Democrats know exactly what they're doing. They lost the 2024 election decisively. Americans rejected their policies, their candidates, and their vision for the country. Unable to win democratically, they're attempting to delegitimize the Trump administration through increasingly extreme accusations designed to convince their unhinged base that this government is illegitimate and must be resisted by any means necessary.
AOC's assassination rhetoric represents the logical endpoint of this strategy. You can't escalate much further than accusing the Vice President of wanting to murder citizens in the streets. What comes next—accusing Trump of planning death camps? Claiming Republicans are plotting ethnic cleansing?
The Media's Complicity
Predictably, the mainstream media that spent years obsessing over every Trump tweet as "dangerous rhetoric" has largely ignored or downplayed AOC's genuinely dangerous accusation. CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post—all of whom would spend weeks dissecting any remotely controversial statement from a Republican—barely covered AOC's deranged smear.
This double standard reveals the media's role as Democrat propagandists rather than journalists. When Republicans use strong language, it's "incitement" and "dangerous rhetoric" that threatens democracy. When Democrats literally accuse the Vice President of supporting mass murder, it's either ignored entirely or contextualized as "passionate" opposition to "extreme" policies.
The media's complicity in Democrats' violent rhetoric extends beyond mere silence. By constantly portraying conservatives as extremists, fascists, and threats to democracy, corporate media creates the climate where AOC's assassination rhetoric seems plausible to the left's base. They've spent years telling viewers that Trump and Republicans represent existential threats—is it any wonder some Democrats believe the administration literally wants to kill people?
What This Reveals About the Left
AOC's unhinged accusation exposes several uncomfortable truths about the modern progressive movement:
Complete Detachment from Reality: To believe Vance supports assassinating Americans requires such profound disconnect from reality that it suggests genuine mental instability or willful dishonesty. Either AOC actually believes this insanity, which is terrifying, or she's cynically lying to incite her base, which is evil.
Projection: Democrats constantly accuse conservatives of what they themselves are doing. They claim Republicans incite violence while Democrat cities burned in 2020. They warn about "threats to democracy" while attempting to imprison political opponents and remove candidates from ballots. They accuse Vance of supporting assassination while their rhetoric gets conservatives attacked.
Moral Bankruptcy: A movement capable of accusing opponents of supporting mass murder based on policy disagreements has lost all moral authority. This isn't politics—it's derangement masquerading as activism.
Desperation: The escalation to assassination rhetoric reveals Democrats' panic as they face political irrelevance. Trump won decisively. Republicans control Congress. The Supreme Court has a conservative majority. Democrats' only option is increasingly extreme rhetoric hoping to delegitimize what they cannot defeat electorally.
Dangerous Extremism: A political movement that portrays opponents as murderous monsters becomes capable of justifying any action against them. This is how political violence becomes normalized—by dehumanizing opponents to the point where attacking them seems righteous.
The Consequences
AOC's rhetoric will have consequences, even if she faces no personal accountability:
Increased Threats: By portraying Vance as supporting mass murder, AOC increases the likelihood some unhinged leftist will attempt violence against him. She's painting a target on the Vice President's back while providing psychological justification for attacks.
Political Polarization: When politicians accuse opponents of wanting to assassinate citizens, productive discourse becomes impossible. How do you negotiate or compromise with people you've portrayed as genocidal murderers?
Normalized Extremism: Every time Democrats make these extreme accusations without consequences, the Overton window shifts further toward accepting political violence as legitimate.
Reduced Security: The more Democrats delegitimize this administration, the more their supporters view resisting it—even violently—as patriotic duty rather than criminal activity.
Cultural Degradation: When political discourse descends to accusing opponents of supporting street assassinations, society's basic norms of civility and democratic competition collapse.
What Republicans Must Do
Republicans cannot allow this rhetoric to stand unchallenged:
Demand Censure: House Republicans should immediately move to censure AOC for dangerous rhetoric that incites violence against the Vice President. Make Democrats vote on whether accusing Vance of supporting mass murder is acceptable.
Criminal Referral: AOC's statement may constitute threatening the Vice President, which is a federal crime. Refer her to DOJ and demand investigation into whether her rhetoric violates laws protecting federal officials.
Expulsion Consideration: If Democrats won't police their own extremists, Republicans should pursue expulsion. A member who accuses the Vice President of supporting assassination has forfeited the privilege of serving in Congress.
Relentless Exposure: Every Republican should highlight AOC's deranged accusation at every opportunity, making Democrats either defend it or repudiate their progressive darling.
Hold Media Accountable: Demand coverage of AOC's rhetoric with the same intensity media applied to any controversial Trump statement. Expose the double standard relentlessly.
No Normalization: Refuse to treat AOC or other Squad members as legitimate political actors. They're extremists whose rhetoric disqualifies them from serious consideration.
The Bigger Picture
AOC's assassination rhetoric represents more than one congresswoman's instability—it's a symptom of the left's complete rejection of democratic norms. Democrats spent years claiming Trump threatened democracy, yet they're the ones attempting to imprison opponents, remove candidates from ballots, delegitimize election results, and now accusing the Vice President of supporting mass murder.
This is what authoritarianism looks like. Not Trump's mean tweets or policy disagreements Democrats label as "fascism," but the systematic attempt to delegitimize, criminalize, and dehumanize political opposition to the point where violence becomes justifiable.
The American people saw through this insanity in 2024, delivering Democrats a crushing defeat. Rather than accepting their rejection and moderating, Democrats have doubled down on extremism. AOC's latest derangement suggests they've learned nothing and will continue escalating until they either regain power or destroy what's left of American political discourse.
Conclusion: Disqualifying Depravity
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has accused the Vice President of the United States of believing Americans should be assassinated in the streets. This isn't political rhetoric—it's eliminationist propaganda designed to incite violence by portraying opponents as murderous monsters who must be stopped by any means necessary.
Her accusation is baseless, deranged, and dangerous. It's also perfectly consistent with the modern Democrat Party's descent into extremism, where anyone who opposes their agenda becomes not just wrong but evil incarnate deserving of destruction.
Republicans must respond forcefully. Censure AOC. Refer her for criminal investigation. Expose Democrats' violent rhetoric relentlessly. And make clear that this depravity disqualifies her and anyone who defends her from participating in civilized political discourse.
The left claims to fear political violence while their own rhetoric incites it. They warn about threats to democracy while delegitimizing democratically-elected officials. They lecture about dangerous speech while accusing the Vice President of supporting mass murder.
Americans are watching. They see the hypocrisy, the extremism, and the desperation. They rejected it in 2024, and they'll reject it again in 2026 and beyond—assuming Democrats' increasingly unhinged rhetoric doesn't inspire the violence they claim to oppose but clearly encourage.
AOC has revealed what the left has become: a movement so consumed by hatred and divorced from reality that they're willing to accuse their opponents of supporting assassination. It's disgusting. It's dangerous. And it must be condemned and confronted by everyone who values democratic discourse and political stability.
The mask is off. Democrats are the extremists. Democrats are the ones inciting violence. Democrats are the threat to democracy. And AOC's depraved accusation against Vice President Vance proves it beyond any reasonable doubt.
- Article Source:
Fox News
- Photo:
